Archive for the ‘Measurement and metrics’ Category

Build political lists with Xspots

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Never miss an opportunity to get someone’s email address. That’s the key piece of advice the article called Online Advocacy Tools: Email Lists gives to advocacy organizations and political campaigns.

“Successful campaigns,” the article continues, “make every effort to convert casual visitors into active supporters,” who, typically, become a primary source of contributions.

Using easy-to-customize calls to action, you can convert any Mixpo Xspot into a list-building tool. Because viewers who join a list through an Xspot have chosen to watch and interact with the ad, they represent a highly-qualified group of leads.

Watch this Scott Brown demo Xspot to experience the list building features for yourself.

While the Xspot plays, expand the INFO menu and click the Volunteer Today! link. Click the Become a Scott Brown Supporter! overlay to open a custom lead capture form.

Note These lead capture calls to action are for demo purposes only and weren’t actually used during the Scott Brown campaign.

Learn more about dynamic video advertising for politics.

Contact us to learn more about building lists with Xspots.

Brown campaign validates Mixpo model

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

Scott Brown’s come-from-behind victory in the recent Massachusetts Senate race is widely attributed to his effective online communications and advertising model (for example, see An Online Model for the GOP?).

As part of that online model, in the final days leading up to the election, the Brown campaign trafficked an interactive Mixpo Xspot across the Boston Herald online edition. During the 10-day Xspot campaign, the paper served almost 1.5 million impressions.

  • Voters chose to watch and engage with Brown’s Xspot nearly twice as often as the industry standard for online video ads.
  • The Xspot campaign’s clickthrough rate exceeded the typical rate for display ads by almost double.
  • On average, viewers watched 78 percent of the Xspot.
  • Brown’s message was communicated for a total of 267 hours.

To learn more about how easy it was for the Brown campaign to convert an existing 30-second TV spot into an interactive online Xspot and to use the Xspot to respond to breaking news, read the full case study.

Find more information and resources on our political microsite.

Monitor Xspot views by DMA

Thursday, December 10th, 2009

Online video advertising is increasingly local. The Kelsey Group predicted that local online video ad revenue would reach $1.5 billion by 2012.

In an interview with Fred Aun of ClickZ, Matt Booth, SVP and program director for The Kelsey Group’s Interactive Local Media practice, explained the revenue growth this way: Local video ads are effective and result in action. Kelsey’s "User View" study found that 47.3 percent of the people who watched a local video ad visited the advertiser’s website.

In keeping with these predictions, large and small advertisers are jumping on the local video bandwagon. National advertisers are increasingly turning national campaigns local by geotargeting calls to action and contact information.

With this trend toward local advertising, advertisers need to know if their ads are reaching the intended audience. That’s why Mixpo recently supplemented the Viewer Locations map that we’ve always provided with a new analytics feature that allows advertisers to monitor Xspot performance by designated marketing area (DMA).

Viewer Locations map

Viewer Locations map we've always provided

By generating a custom Xspot report in the Dashboard, you can immediately see a list of the 210 U.S. DMAs arranged in descending order by the number of views that occurred in each.

Portion of DMA list in custom report

Portion of DMA list in custom report - Click for larger image

How DMA data can shape campaigns

Suppose a state agency is running a campaign for the local lottery. By examining the DMA view data (especially in combination with the Domain filter), the agency can tell how effectively publishers are delivering impressions to the target audience. Based on the data, the agency can modify its media plan or work with existing publishers to improve targeting.

Suppose a travel agency is running an Xspot campaign to promote discounted fares to the Caribbean. Based on click data from the DMA list, the agency can identify cities where the campaign generates the most activity. This gives the travel agency valuable insight into shaping future campaigns by directing impressions toward the most active markets.

More information

Mixpo subscribers can learn more about monitoring performance by DMA by visiting the Reports page, and then clicking Can I monitor Xspot views by DMA?

Conversion tracking for Xspots

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Publishers charge more to run online video ads than display ads. But, in many cases, video ad click-through rates (CTRs) are not substantially higher than display ad CTRs. Is the higher CPM cost worth it?

A June, 2009 DoubleClick research report, called The Brand Value of Rich Media and Video Ads, suggests a resounding Yes. Viewers exposed to rich media ads with video showed a 1.16% increase in purchase intent compared with only a .50% increase for viewers exposed to rich media ads without video.

But for many advertisers, recommendations based on cumulative research data simply aren’t compelling enough. They want to see concrete results based on their own ads for themselves.

That’s why, at Mixpo, we now offer advertisers an easy way to compare the number of conversions that result from a display ad versus an Xspot.

Advertisers can use the Mixpo platform to run a display ad and an Xspot simultaneously and track the number of people who visit a landing page after:

  • Opening the page where the online ad is embedded.
  • Viewing the online ad.

In addition, advertisers can compare what Aaron Reinitz, in Clicks, Cookies, Conversions, and Cough Drops, calls “intention metrics.”

Conversion tracking intention metrics

Conversion tracking intention metrics

For each type of online ad, advertisers can track visitors’ progress through the purchase funnel, from the landing page, through the purchase intent page, to the page where the final sale occurs.

This not only answers the question about which type of online ad drove more sales. It also generates valuable consumer insights and helps advertisers optimize their purchase processes.

Resolve the display ad versus Xspot controversy for yourself. Contact a customer service representative about running your own display-ad-versus-Xspot campaign.

More information

Mixpo subscribers can learn more about conversion tracking by visiting the Advanced page, and then clicking Track conversions resulting from an Xspot.

Didn’t know you could run display ads using the Mixpo platform? Visit the Create page, and then click Can I run a display ad using the Mixpo platform?.

Track performance by domain

Monday, November 23rd, 2009

If you’re running campaigns across multiple publisher sites, as most advertisers and agencies do, you need data that helps you best optimize your media spend. It’s crucial to understand which publishers are giving you the best return on your CPM investment.

At Mixpo, we’re always refining our performance analytics to give you the data you need. Recently, we added a Domain filter to the Dashboard that allows you to compare impressions, views, clicks, exposure, viewer locations, and even Xspot placement across publishers.

Example: Compare Xspot Position maps

Suppose you’re seeing large differences in engagement rates between publisher sites. Xspot placement may explain it.

Compare the following Xspot Position maps. The first, for the publisher with a lower engagement rate, shows the Xspot running primarily below the fold. In contrast, the second map, for the publisher with a higher engagement rate, shows the Xspot running above the fold.

Xspot running primarily below the fold

Publisher 1: Xspot running primarily below the fold

Xspot running above the fold

Publisher 2: Xspot running above the fold

Example: Compare Viewer Location maps

Suppose you’re seeing loads of impressions for one publisher but few views or clicks. Another publisher has fewer impressions but a significantly higher views-to-impressions ratio. Audience targeting may explain it.

Compare the following two Viewer Location maps for an Xspot targeting a Montana audience. The top map suggests that the Xspot is being served to all viewers regardless of their locations, which results in a lot of wasted impressions. The bottom map suggests that the Xspot was better targeted at the appropriate local audience.

Xspot served to all viewers

Publisher 1: Xspot served to all viewers

Xspot served to viewers by location

Publisher 2: Xspot served to viewers by location

More performance analytics enhancements are on the way, including an analysis of performance data by designated marketing area (DMA). Check back soon for details.

More information

Mixpo subscribers can learn more about the Domain filter by visiting the Reports page, and then clicking Can I monitor Xspot performance by domain?

Video Kills the Display Ad Metrics

Tuesday, September 15th, 2009

In an article published awhile back in Adotas, we said, “ Display ads have needed an overhaul for the longest time. Uninformative, overly flashy, cheesy as in “lose 30 pounds in one week” type ads have lead to banner blindness. With the advent of video display ads, the time has come to reinvent the experience as well as the metrics.”

Our meta-point is this: it’s not the display ad that is dead, it’s the content that has been running in it, and the metrics used to gauge success.

McDonald’s and other advertisers see success with Online VideoAds

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

In a recent post (Capturing the value of VideoAds), I talked about capturing the value of VideoAds.  I introduced the thesis that video display ads are different than regular display ads and much more effective both for advertisers and prospects. 

VideoAds running in-banner benefit prospects by:

- Creating a richer presentation that’s highly interactive and more informative

- Bring information TO the viewer rather than forcing them to click away

- Keeping viewers in control and letting them take action when they're ready

And for advertisers by:

- Providing more insight into how receptive viewers are to an advertiser’s message

- Working across the purchase funnel helping advertisers achieve brand awareness and purchase    
   intent goals or conversion related goals, e.g., email inquiries, or, yes, even click to a website when      the viewer is ready

Again, working with our publishing partners, we’re seeing the benefits of VideoAds for advertisers both large and small who focus on the local market. 

One of the world’s most recognized brands goes local

Case in Point: McDonald's wanted to drive awareness of the regional launch of McCafe and their new line of coffee drinks.   They launched a VideoAd campaign in the Detroit area repurposing seven of their television spots.  Viewers watched over 1100 minutes and on average each viewer watched over 80 percent of the VideoAd.

McDonalds Case Study
Download Ad-0406-fastfood_core

A local tourism bureau goes big with VideoAds

Case in Point: Sonoma Country Tourism is like a “little piece of Provence” and wanted to drive awareness of that fact by showcasing the epicurean delights on Sonoma.   They also wanted to drive action – clicks, calls, and inquiries.  In three weeks they generated over 1100 clicks with a 0.53 percent CTR.

Sonoma Case Study
Download Ad-0403-wl_tourism_core-1

A regional healthcare provider finds the perfect marketing medicine

Case in Point: The University of Washington Medicine and Harborview Medical Center in Seattle, Washington, serves the northwest community but is more known for its trauma center and university medical school than the world-class specialty practices in areas like Brain Aneurysms and Heart Arrhythmias.  Using existing videos and turning them into VideoAds, they generated over 13,000 minutes of view over the 10-week campaign period.  The average length of each VideoAd was 2 minutes, yet viewers watched over 50 percent.

UW Medicine_Harborview_Neighborhood Clinics Case Study
Download Ad-0422-uw_core

A Performing Arts Center has a command performance online

Case in Point: The Orange County Performing Arts Center (OCPAC) wanted to promote a series of events in rapid succession, get people excited, and drive ticket sales.  With events ranging from Stomp to CATs, OCPAC achieved an engagement rate that was 7X that of the click through rates regular display ads achieve.  The top performing event, Backyardigans, achieved an ER of almost 1.70 percent.

Orange County Performing Arts Center Case Study
Download Ad-0403-performing_arts_core-1

Conclusion: These local advertisers understand that the display ad can do so much more than provide a click.  With video, display ads can drive brand awareness, purchase intent and lead customers down the purchase funnel to a sale but it all starts with getting viewers to engage with your message and become prospects.   The click isn’t dead in display ads,steve it just has lots more company.

Video Kills The Display Ad?

Tuesday, April 14th, 2009

Display ads have needed an overhaul for quite some time. The sole benefit of "the click" and associated clickthrough rate is under siege now that video is being incorporated into banner ad real estate.  It's high time to advance the regular display ad. 

Video enabled display ads offer so much more capability than their ancestral cousin.  VideoAds offer the ability to engage viewers and turn them into prospects no matter where they are in the purchase funnel and that includes BUT not limited to driving direct response (or clicks). 

For more on the topic, I invite you to check out the featured article, "Video kills the display ad…metrics" just released on Adotas.

Capturing the value of VideoAds

Tuesday, April 7th, 2009

Working with our local media publisher partners, over the past several months, we’ve run thousands of ad campaigns delivering tens of millions of VideoAd impressions. In the process, we’re learning a lot about what makes for an effective VideoAd campaign.

At a macro level, we know that video display ads act totally different from regular display ads. Regular display ads provide a click.  VideoAds not only offer sight, sound and motion, but ways for viewers to engage with the ad and get more from it. Viewers can get the full brand’s message in one place. They get the value proposition, the offer or the promotion. They also control the experience, how and when to interact and, yes, even click.

At a more measured level, consequently VideoAds provide richer metrics on effectiveness. What  ‘effectiveness’ means, however, varies based on the objective of the advertiser. VideoAds show advertisers how viewers respond and interact, how much they watch, if their interest goes up by expanding the player to full screen. And when clicks are measured, VideoAds again go beyond regular display ads ─ not just measuring if a click occurs but when it occurs indicating a better or more qualified lead.

Taking a sample of our case study work for advertisers in automotive, travel, events, and sports we’ve seen how VideoAds help advertisers reach their advertising objective driving average engagement rates (ER) 5X that of the clickthrough rate (CTR) of regular display ads and brand exposure (represented by average view time) where viewers on average watch more than 70 percent of the total video.

A MLB team swings for the fences
Case in point: A major league baseball team, in the dark days of January, wanted to get people excited about the upcoming season. Running a VideoAd campaign, the MLB team achieved an engagement rate that was nearly 7X the CTR of a regular display ad.

Baseball

Download Ad-0403-baseball_generic-1

A local television station sweeps up success
Oftentimes, advertisers just want to ‘get the message’ out and drive offline activity.

Case in point: A western U.S. local television station wanted to promote some special news programs to drive viewership up during the critical sweeps week. In one week, over 660 minutes of the VideoAd was watched.

TV Station

Download Ad-0403-tv_station_generic-1

An auto dealer drives clicks
And of course, some advertisers want to drive clicks and interactions ─ especially important for “tough times” categories like automotive.

Case in point: A luxury auto dealer wanted to increase visits to a website where it was promoting a new “affordable” luxury SUV.  A VideoAd promoting the new model generated more than 90 clicks and 100 interactions in just one week.

Auto

Download Ad-0403-auto_generic-1

A Ski resort takes viewer on a long run
Finally, video – even short 15 second ones – tell a story that regular display can’t. Advertisers can make their case for their business and viewers get more information.

Case in point: A ski resort in Colorado, where some of the best resorts in the world reside, wanted to differentiate themselves from the pack. Their VideoAd campaign not only generated high ER but also brand exposure. On average, viewers watched over 70 percent of the VideoAd, and 54 percent of the viewers watched it all the way through.

Ski Resort
 

Download Ad-0403-ski_resort_generic-1

There’s lots of debate going on about the true value of display and how insufficient the click has been as the metric for success. Video changes that. Video affords advertisers more flexibility to meet different objectives and the Internet acts as an enabler for measuring success across those varied objectives. Engagement and brand exposure capture the value of video advertising. Clicks are just a part of the value – with their importance dialed up or down based on the advertisers’ objectives. 

So does engagement trump clicks? 
We believe it does.  Engagement tells a better story than clicks alone do about what is going on in an ad, whether the message resonated or not, and when the viewer took action and what those actions were – all benefits to the advertiser who wants transparency on performance.  Similarly, video tells a better story to the viewer, providing them better information that they digest without clicking away, and letting them choose how and when they engage – with the benefit of control and choice being theirs. 

In this new world of video advertising, value goes both ways.

Who’s winning the race for online video ad dollars?

Friday, March 27th, 2009

Borrell Associates reports that newspapers are beating out local TV in local video revenue.  In fact, they also report that IYP’s, who sell advertorial video to SMBs, are poised to pass local TV as well.

I’m surprised for a couple of reasons:  1) local TV already has clients who run broadcast ads, hence, it should be an easy 1-2 punch to sell existing advertisers on “packages” that extend their reach online; and 2) local TV sales folks “get video” and marrying video to the performance metrics of online should make for an easy sale.

The cable companies, on the other hand, are making traction.  Borrell notes how they are targeting video ads down to the zip and neighborhood level. And they certainly have digitally smart local sales people who know how to sell video.

My conclusion: there are lots of local media publishers who can play in the online video ad game but are at different stages in doing so. 

To me, the report is less about who is winning today and more about the rich opportunity all local publishers have to take what they have: a local sales force, existing advertisers, great local content, and ad inventory they can sell themselves at a premium, and generate big time online ad revenue with video. 

The current year aside, everyone is still bullish on online advertising revenue growth and how video will help to fuel it for years to come.

Nonetheless, the point is clear: to be a player, you first have to get on the field.